Connect with us

Latest

Authorities expand criminal prosecution of Azerbaijani bloggers and journalists abroad

Published

on

Court proceedings continue in Baku on criminal cases opened against several well-known Azerbaijani bloggers and internet channel leaders living abroad. In recent weeks, reports have been consistently published both about trials in absentia at the Baku Serious Crimes Court and calls for foreign-based journalists and activists to appear for questioning by the General Prosecutor’s Office.

New case at Baku Serious Crimes Court: Trial in absentia of 8 people

On November 21, the Baku Serious Crimes Court began a trial in a criminal case against bloggers living abroad: Tural Sadigli, Elshad Mammadov, Gurban Mammadov, and Suleyman Suleymanli. The sessions are being held in absentia under the chairmanship of Judge Huseyn Huseynli.

According to the announced charges, three more individuals are also included as defendants: Ordukhan Teymurkhan (Babirov), Orkhan Aghayev, and Rafael Piriev. They are accused under several serious articles of the Criminal Code, including fraud, calls for terrorism, open agitation against the state, and forgery of official documents.

Since all the defendants are outside the country, the court has imposed preventive measures in the form of arrest in absentia, and the trial is proceeding in absentia.

The wave that began in June: In absentia arrest of 7 bloggers

This case is considered part of a broader process that has continued since the beginning of the year against activists living abroad.

In June, the Binagadi District Court granted the General Prosecutor’s Office’s request and imposed preventive measures in the form of arrest in absentia for several bloggers residing outside Azerbaijan: Imameddin Alimanov, Suleyman Suleymanli, Elshad Mammadov, Mohammed Mirzali, Gabil Mammadov, Orkhan Aghayev, and Gurban Mammadov.

According to the Investigative Department of the General Prosecutor’s Office, they have been charged under several serious articles — fraud, calls for terrorism, calls for mass riots, and agitation against the state.

New decisions on arrests in absentia: Osmangizi, Gafarov, Manafov

In recent weeks, the General Prosecutor’s Office has reported the initiation of criminal cases against journalists and bloggers living abroad — Sevinj Osmangizi, Abid Gafarov, and Beydulla Manafov.

According to official data:

  • Journalist Sevinj Osmangizi is charged under Articles 220.2 (calls for disobedience to lawful demands of authorities, mass disorder, and violence against citizens) and 281.2 (public calls against the state, committed repeatedly or by a group). An arrest in absentia has been issued for her. She has been placed on the international wanted list.
  • Blogger Abid Gafarov is charged under the same articles; he has also been declared wanted and arrested in absentia by the decision of the Binagadi District Court.
  • Journalist Beydulla Manafov is facing a criminal case under Articles 281.2 and 283.1 (incitement of hatred and enmity using the media), and an arrest in absentia is also in effect for him.

Among those summoned for questioning are also historian Altay Goyushov, political scientist Arastun Orujlu, the exiled editor-in-chief of the newspaper Azadliq, Ganimat Zahid, founders of various internet channels, and other socio-political activists; many of them have also been subjected to arrest in absentia or placed on the wanted list.

The case of Manaf Jalilzade and Switzerland’s refusal of extradition

The General Prosecutor’s Office is also pursuing criminal proceedings against blogger Manaf Jalilzade, who lives abroad. He has been charged under Article 281.2 of the Criminal Code (public calls against the state committed repeatedly or by a group) and summoned for questioning. Azerbaijan has submitted a request for his extradition.

The Swiss Federal Ministry of Justice rejected Azerbaijan’s extradition request for Jalilzade. The statement noted that the request was denied because, if the blogger were handed over to Azerbaijani authorities, there would be a risk of torture and a potential violation of his right to a fair trial.

Authorities’ position: “Legal response to anti-state campaigns”

Milli Mejlis deputy Mushfig Jafarov previously accused foreign-based bloggers of conducting an “anti-Azerbaijani smear campaign” in an interview with pravda.az and stated that these individuals would be brought to the country “in accordance with the law.”

In official statements, the General Prosecutor’s Office links trials in absentia and arrest decisions to “acts directed against state security, the constitutional order, and public order,” as well as allegations of calls for violence and unrest through the media.

Critical views and political assessments

Public discussions have produced several perspectives:

  • Opposition representatives, human rights defenders, and some political commentators consider arrests in absentia and successive criminal cases as a strategy of political pressure. They argue that these decisions aim both to intimidate critics abroad and create an atmosphere of fear domestically.
  • Politicians close to the authorities and official circles present these measures as “responses to calls against the state” and a “legal stance against campaigns discrediting Azerbaijan.”

Economist and chairman of the Political Committee of the ReAl Party, Natig Jafarli, suggested on social media that decisions regarding certain foreign-based “provocative bloggers” might also serve as a strategic tool for the authorities. He presented four general arguments:

  1. Such decisions are more likely to keep these individuals in Europe than to result in actual extradition.
  2. They provide additional protection for some migrants with weak legal status or incomplete integration into European society.
  3. These bloggers, by spreading compromising information that harms the opposition’s image, effectively perform a function beneficial to the authorities.
  4. Therefore, in some cases, their activities may align with the interests of certain intra-governmental groups.

Exile blogger Gabil Mammadov rejected most of these claims in an interview with Meydan TV but did not rule out that there may be “a grain of truth” in them. According to him, criminal cases against him and other bloggers are not related to offensive rhetoric but are based on charges such as terrorism, fraud, and resistance to authorities — and are politically motivated.

Political commentator and founding council member of the “III Republic” platform, Elman Fattah, described arrests in absentia as a “typical strategy of authoritarian systems,” noting that the mechanism is used both to instill fear domestically and, even if immediate results are unlikely, to create a façade of legitimacy internationally.

These statements have not been commented on by official institutions; the General Prosecutor’s Office emphasizes that the charges are based solely on criminal procedural and legal grounds.

Legal basis: Expansion of the in-absentia mechanism

Lawyer Fariz Namazli recalls that in December 2023, amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code allowed law enforcement authorities to conduct in-absentia proceedings for individuals living abroad, prepare indictments, submit cases to court, and issue verdicts. This mechanism is later used as an additional legal basis for extradition requests.

Lawyer Ruslan Aliyev notes that European countries’ extradition decisions in politically motivated cases are usually negative, and such in-absentia trials “remain primarily a tool of political pressure.” Investigative actions and other procedural measures can be conducted abroad using alternative methods.

Current situation

The Baku Serious Crimes Court continues the in-absentia trial of Tural Sadigli, Gurban Mammadov, Elshad Mammadov, Suleyman Suleymanli, Ordukhan Teymurkhan, Orkhan Aghayev, and Rafael Piriev; the next session is scheduled in the coming days.

The Binagadi District Court and the General Prosecutor’s Office confirm that arrest-in-absentia and wanted-list decisions for Sevinj Osmangizi, Abid Gafarov, Beydulla Manafov, and other journalists, political scientists, and activists remain in effect.

Switzerland’s decision regarding Manaf Jalilzade and the positions of other European countries are considered precedents for future extradition requests.

Some Azerbaijani bloggers and activists living abroad reject the charges and consider the trials politically motivated, while authorities deny this and assert that the decisions are made “strictly in accordance with legal requirements.”

The post Authorities expand criminal prosecution of Azerbaijani bloggers and journalists abroad appeared first on MEYDAN.TV.

Continue Reading

Latest

Azerbaijan’s president proposes broad amnesty initiative: Who could benefit?

Published

on

President Ilham Aliyev has proposed an amnesty initiative on the occasion of the “Year of the Constitution and Sovereignty.” Azertac reported on the initiative, noting that the amnesty is expected to apply to more than 20,000 people if adopted. The proposal has sparked wide public debate across Azerbaijan, with legal experts stressing that the figure does not automatically mean the release of 20,000 prisoners, as the application of amnesty is governed by strict legal criteria and limitations.

Legal framework: How the amnesty process works

Under Article 95 of the Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the authority to declare an amnesty lies with the Milli Majlis (Parliament). The President may only initiate the process by submitting a legislative proposal. Once introduced, the draft amnesty act is discussed in parliament and put to a vote.

According to legal expert Emin Abbasov, after the presidential initiative is formally submitted, parliament must vote on it within two months. In practice, initiatives originating from the Presidential Administration have never been rejected by the Milli Majlis, making the adoption of the amnesty highly likely.

Amnesty vs. Presidential Pardon

Although the terms “amnesty” and “pardon” are often used interchangeably, they represent distinct legal mechanisms.

A presidential pardon is granted by decree and applies to specific individuals. There are no legal restrictions related to the severity of the crime, meaning the President may pardon even those convicted of particularly serious offenses.

An amnesty, by contrast:

  • Is applied to categories of people rather than individuals;
  • Specifies particular articles of the Criminal Code;
  • Generally excludes those convicted of serious or especially serious crimes;
  • Is adopted by parliament rather than by presidential decree.

Through an amnesty act:

  • Individuals who have committed crimes but have not yet received a final court verdict may be released from criminal liability;
  • Sentences of convicted persons may be fully or partially reduced;
  • The unserved portion of a sentence may be replaced with a lighter punishment;
  • Criminal records may be cleared.

Key provisions of the draft amnesty act

The draft amnesty act provides for the release from punishment or criminal liability of individuals who participated in combat operations for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Azerbaijan, including the Second Karabakh War and the anti-terrorist operation conducted on September 19–20, 2023. The draft also applies to close relatives of those who were killed or went missing during these operations, as well as to individuals who became disabled as a result of Armenia’s military provocations against the civilian population. In addition, women, persons aged 60 and over, those who were minors at the time of committing a crime, and other categories of individuals are also covered by the amnesty act.

According to forecasts:

  • More than 5,000 convicts will be released from imprisonment;
  • The sentences of more than 3,000 individuals sentenced to imprisonment will be reduced;
  • More than 7,000 convicts will be released from sentences of restriction of liberty;
  • Nearly 4,000 individuals will be released from other or suspended sentences not involving imprisonment;
  • In addition, more than 1,000 people are expected to be released from criminal liability.

Crime Categories Under Azerbaijani Law

The Criminal Code of Azerbaijan classifies crimes into four categories based on their degree of public danger:

  • Crimes not posing significant public danger – punishable by up to two years of imprisonment or non-custodial penalties;
  • Less serious crimes – punishable by up to seven years of imprisonment;
  • Serious crimes – punishable by up to twelve years of imprisonment;
  • Especially serious crimes – punishable by more than twelve years of imprisonment or harsher penalties.

Historically, all amnesty acts in Azerbaijan have primarily applied to the first two categories.

Who could be covered by the new amnesty?

According to the draft currently under discussion in the Milli Majlis Committee on Legal Policy and State Building, excluding serious and especially serious crimes, the amnesty is expected to apply to the following categories:

  • Participants in combat operations for Azerbaijan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, including the Second Karabakh War and the anti-terrorist operation conducted on September 19–20, 2023;
  • Close relatives of individuals killed or missing during these operations;
  • Individuals awarded orders and medals for military service;
  • Persons who became disabled as a result of Armenia’s military provocations against civilians;
  • Victims of the Khojaly tragedy, the January 20 events, deportations, and their close relatives;
  • Internally displaced persons;
  • Women;
  • Individuals who committed crimes before reaching the age of 18;
  • Persons aged 60 and over;
  • Persons with disabilities;
  • Individuals caring for minor or disabled children.

In addition, the amnesty may cover:

  • Those convicted of crimes not posing significant public danger;
  • Individuals sentenced to up to five years’ imprisonment for crimes committed through negligence;
  • Persons convicted of less serious crimes with less than one year remaining on their sentence;
  • First-time offenders convicted of serious crimes with less than six months remaining on their sentence;
  • Those sentenced to non-custodial or alternative punishments, including suspended sentences, community service, correctional labor, fines, or restriction of liberty.

Expected impact: What does “20,000 people” mean?

Lawyer Fariz Namazli stresses that the statement that the amnesty “applies to more than 20,000 people” does not mean all of them will be released from prison. The figure also includes:

  • Individuals whose sentences will be reduced;
  • Those released conditionally or on probation;
  • Persons released from criminal liability altogether.

Based on previous amnesties, those nearing the end of their sentences—typically with six months to one year remaining—are most likely to be released, while others may receive partial sentence reductions.

Political prisoners, journalists, and Armenian detainees

According to both Fariz Namazli and Emin Abbasov, individuals recognized as political prisoners by international organizations are unlikely to benefit from the amnesty, as most face charges classified as serious or especially serious crimes. This includes cases involving large-scale drug trafficking (Criminal Code Article 234.1-1), as well as journalists and activists charged with financial crimes, smuggling, or other serious offenses.

Although MP Agil Abbas expressed hope during a parliamentary session that imprisoned journalists might be included, legal experts note that such a move would not align with the legal framework governing amnesties.

Can Armenian prisoners be included in the amnesty?

Legal experts also state that Armenian prisoners held in Azerbaijan have been convicted of serious or especially serious crimes and therefore cannot be covered by the amnesty. Their release would only be possible through individual presidential pardons.

What’s behind the amnesty decision?

Emin Abbasov notes that behind such a large-scale amnesty there is not only a humanitarian approach but also practical necessities. According to the 2024 statistics of the Council of Europe:

  • Azerbaijan ranks 2nd in Europe in terms of the number of prisoners per 100,000 people;
  • 48% of the prison population has been convicted for drug-related crimes;
  • In recent years, the rate of recidivism has exceeded 28%.

These indicators show that there are serious problems in the penal and correctional system.

Thus, it can be said that this amnesty will mostly apply to those convicted of less serious crimes and those in the final stages of their sentences. For individuals recognized as political prisoners, journalists, and activists imprisoned on serious criminal charges, this decision will most likely not bring significant changes.

The post Azerbaijan’s president proposes broad amnesty initiative: Who could benefit? appeared first on MEYDAN.TV.

Continue Reading

Latest

Deportation order issued against Gultakin Hajibayli

Published

on

On December 15, a deportation order has been issued in Turkey for Gultakin Hajibayli, a member of the Coordination Council of the National Council, banning her from the country for five years.

She shared this information on her Facebook page. The politician addressed her appeal to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and considers the decision against her to be unfounded.

“Despite having a two-year residence permit in Turkey and not violating any regulations to date, issuing such a decision against me is an injustice. The basis for this decision has not been explained,” she wrote.

Gultakin Hajibayli also stated that on November 29, she had filed a court appeal regarding her detention under special strict supervision in a deportation center in Turkey.

“I filed a court appeal regarding my detention under special strict supervision in a deportation center in Turkey since November 29 without any legal grounds. The fact that such a decision was hastily made without waiting for the court’s ruling indicates that this decision was not legal but political,” she said.

Hajibayli later noted that preparations were underway for her deportation to Azerbaijan.

“I want to inform that three days ago I was transferred from the Arnavutkoy Deportation Center, where I was initially held, to the Catalca Deportation Center. According to the information I have, detainees in this center usually stay for a shorter period. Therefore, I have the impression that preparations are being made for my forced deportation to Azerbaijan,” she stated.

She appealed to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, urging Turkey not to support the Azerbaijani authorities in imprisoning their political opponents.

“Mr. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, I still cannot believe that the state of Turkey, which I love with all my heart, consider my second homeland, and have always defended and promoted through my political activity, will trample on justice and law to forcibly send me to Azerbaijan to be imprisoned. Under no circumstances should Turkey support the Azerbaijani authorities, who have launched a war against democracy, in imprisoning their political opponents with fabricated charges. Any steps taken in this regard should take into account historical responsibility,” she said.

On November 29, police in Turkey took Gultakin Hajibayli from her residence and placed her under administrative control with G-82 code in the category of “foreigners posing a threat to national security.”

She considers this decision politically motivated and stated that she would be imprisoned if deported.

It is believed that Gultakin Hajibayli’s detention on November 29 was related to the arrest in Baku of the Azerbaijan Popular Front Party chairman Ali Karimli and Executive Committee member Mammad Ibrahim.

The post Deportation order issued against Gultakin Hajibayli appeared first on MEYDAN.TV.

Continue Reading

Latest

APFP member who wrote “Stalin” on Heydar Aliyev’s statue reportedly committed suicide in prison

Published

on

Elbay Karimli, a member of the Azerbaijan Popular Front Party (APFP) who was in custody, reportedly committed suicide on December 12 at the medical unit of Penitentiary Institution No. 2.

APFP told Meydan TV that Elbay Karimli hanged himself in the prison’s medical unit. The reason for the suicide is unknown.

The Ministry of Justice stated that an investigation is being conducted at the Khazar District Prosecutor’s Office regarding the death of Elbay Karimli.

Elbay Karimli was arrested in August 2023 after writing “Stalin” on a statue of Heydar Aliyev.

“Because I wrote ‘Stalin’ on the back of Heydar Aliyev’s statue, I am here today. At the police station, they told me, ‘Choose either drugs or weapons, or you will be charged with treason against the homeland. We will download pictures of military objects from your phone and accuse you of transmitting military secrets to Armenia or Iran.’ My throat went dry from what I heard. They said, ‘Don’t end up like Giyas, with 1 kilo taken from your house…,’” Elbay Karimli told his lawyer after being detained.

In 2024, the Baku Court of Grave Crimes sentenced him to six years in prison under the Criminal Code for possession of a large quantity of drugs with intent to sell.

Later, the Supreme Court reduced his sentence to five years by removing the element of intent to sell.

Currently, more than 20 members of APFP are in detention.

The party’s chairman, Ali Karimli, and Executive Committee member Mammad Ibrahim were arrested on December 1 and accused of attempting to forcibly seize power and change the constitutional order of the state. They were detained for 2 months and 15 days.

The party considers these arrests politically motivated.

The post APFP member who wrote “Stalin” on Heydar Aliyev’s statue reportedly committed suicide in prison appeared first on MEYDAN.TV.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2008-2025 - AzeriTimes.com